NoCap-Test evidence · think2earn 2026-07-16 · 3/3 sealed
Source code ↗

BottleCapAI NoCap-Test · comprehensive campaign report

3/3 · ≈8.3% under sealed F1_seal

Carol Calin · ML Engineer and NLP Researcher, BottleCapAI NoCap-Test · acalincarol@gmail.com

On three independent seeds (1337, 2029, 4242), the claim-stack candidate (Muon + B32 + timing-cheap split-QKV) first-crosses val_disjoint ≤ 3.3821 in 3.553 h, 3.567 h, and 3.511 h.

Versus sealed stock AdamW F1_seal at 3.866 h: +8.1%, +7.7%, +9.2%. Mean ΔT% ≈ +8.3%. Mean candidate T ≈ 3.544 h. Terminal candidate CE ≈ 3.37.

Where measured, joint-QKV stock never crosses (1337, 2029). Seed 4242 stock was not run. Matched candidate-vs-stock first-cross ΔT% is N/A.

Pin: A100-SXM4-40GB · torch 2.13.0+cu130.

Not claimed. Not an official NoCap win. Matched cand-vs-stock ΔT% = N/A. Public % vs F1_seal only.

The metric

First-passage train time. Quality gate and speed clock are separate. Quality bar: disjoint val ≤ 3.3821. Speed clock: measured train_time_ms (validation paused; compile warmup inside the path).

T = train_time_ms at the first logged row where val_disjoint ≤ 3.3821, in hours.

T_h = train_time_ms ÷ 3,600,000
ΔT% = 100 × (3.866 − T_h) / 3.866

Denominator: sealed F1_seal on Clock-W — first-cross @4736, val 3.381538, T = 3.866 h. Historical notebook F1 (~229.1 min) is provisional. Never used for published %.

Loading first-passage chart…

Loading…
Metric skim. Gate (≤ 3.3821) → clock (F1_seal 3.866 h) → cross (ΔT%). Interactive; same data as verify chart below.

Noise floor: measured stack drift ~6% step-time. Single-seed |ΔT%| < ~6%: do not publish as win. Sealed candidates all ≥6%.

Challenge mapping: CHALLENGE_TERMS.html · clock rules: FAIR_CLOCK.html.

What we tried

Process · Kill → Bank → Seal campaign order · not a % claim

Beat 01

Kill

Close paths that miss quality or speed before spending more GPU time.

Beat 02

Bank

Keep promoted components (Muon, B32×accum16, timing-cheap split-QKV) as blocks — banking is not the claim.

Beat 03

Seal · 3/3

First-cross the quality bar on three seeds; compare wall-clock T to sealed F1_seal only.

Kill — Close paths that miss quality or speed before spending more GPU time.

Step through the campaign order. Full detail: kill → bank → seal. Matched cand-vs-stock ΔT% = N/A · not an official win.

Kill → bank → 3/3. Process: kill → bank → seal. Kill first: F2 / claim_muon_par quality miss; claim_muon_wsd quality without speed (~0.8% slower than F1_seal); Tier A and closed bank levers stay NO-GO. Then bank: B32×accum16 + timing-cheap split-QKV (what QKV is; component evidence, not yet a full claim). Only then seal: candidate recipe first-cross on 3/3 seeds vs sealed F1_seal (3.866 h; mean ΔT% ≈ +8.3%). Joint-QKV stock misses the quality bar where measured — matched cand-vs-stock ΔT% = N/A (why). Muon attribution: muon-explained.html (not Muon-alone ΔT%).

How to read the stack. Process first, then the three banked pieces.

Sealed speed is vs F1_seal only. Matched cand-vs-stock ΔT% = N/A. Not an official win.

Scale: 13 workspaces · each has a nocap volume · 153 runs/ entries (incl. partials). Codes: Clock-W, Claim-W1/W2, Research-W1…W7, Archive-W1…W3.

Family Workspaces Outcome
claim_stack Claim-W1, Claim-W2 3/3 cand HIT vs F1. Stock MISS on 1337/2029.
f1 Clock-W, Claim-W2, Archive-W2 Clock-W + Claim-W2 SEALED. Archive historical only.
claim_muon Clock-W, Research-W2 claim_muon_par MISS. claim_muon_wsd quality HIT, speed miss.
ix / px / b3 Research-W1, W2 Proxy ordinals. Promoted Muon+parallel. No cardinal %.
systems sysv1 Research-W6, W7 B32 ~6% step-time. NS3 / z-loss kill.
theory tv* Research-W3…W7 Cheap-split MECH-REPEAT + W4 p2400 SEAL. Tier A all NO-GO.
curation cv1 Research-W7 Closed. Not claim path.
waves / f2 Archive-W1…W3 Archive-complete. Not claim-stack seals.

Workspace roles

Code Role
Clock-WPublic F1_seal. Also claim_muon_par.
Claim-W1Seeds 1337 (matched) + 4242 (cand-only).
Claim-W2Seed 2029 (matched) + F1_Claim-W2.
Research-W1Proxy / ordinal (ix_*, b3_*).
Research-W2Horizon screens + claim_muon_wsd.
Research-W3…W5Theory / Tier A / cheap-split / Adam LR.
Research-W4Cheap-split persistence seal (seed 5151 @2400).
Research-W6/W7Systems-v1 + curation peer.
Archive-W1…W3Waves / f2 / historical f1.

Banked into the claim recipe: Keller Jordan Muon · B32×accum16 · timing-cheap split-QKV · frozen unigram prior · parallel + fastpath · WSD wu476/wd1192 · z-loss 0 · NS 5 · raw FineWeb · EMA off.

What the numbers say

Three sealed candidates first-cross the quality bar; each is ≥6% under sealed F1_seal on the matched A100/torch pin. Mean ΔT% ≈ +8.3%. Published % is vs F1_seal — not vs joint stock (matched first-cross ΔT% is N/A).

Run Workspace First-cross T vs F1_seal Terminal CE
F1_sealstock AdamW · denominator Clock-W @4736val 3.381538 3.866 h ref 3.379813
F1_Claim-W2same-workspace AdamW check Claim-W2 @4768val 3.380977 3.858 h +0.2%
candidate · s1337Muon B32 + split-QKV · summary-only Claim-W1 @4736val 3.3741 3.553 h +8.1% 3.3710
candidate · s2029Muon B32 + split-QKV Claim-W2 @4736val 3.3726 3.567 h +7.7% 3.3695
candidate · s4242Muon B32 + split-QKV · cand-only Claim-W1 @4736val 3.3733 3.511 h +9.2% 3.3702

Matched pairs

Case tabs · matched-pair status skim · full table below
Candidate yes @4736 · 3.553 h
Stock NONE
Matched ΔT% N/A

Matched pair · joint-QKV stock never crossed · summary-only cand (no public CSV).

Candidate yes @4736 · 3.567 h
Stock NONE
Matched ΔT% N/A

Matched pair · joint-QKV stock never crossed · published % vs F1_seal only (+7.7%).

Candidate yes @4736 · 3.511 h
Stock not run
Matched ΔT% N/A

Cand-only · no stock arm run · still counts toward 3/3 vs F1_seal (+9.2%).

Full matched-pair table (complete evidence)
Seed Candidate Stock Matched ΔT%
1337 yes @4736 · 3.553 h NONE N/A
2029 yes @4736 · 3.567 h NONE N/A
4242 yes @4736 · 3.511 h not run N/A

Published % compares candidate T to F1_seal, not to joint stock. Seed 2029 vs F1_Claim-W2: +7.5%. Canon: NUMBERS_CANON.html. Short scoreboard: preview-schema.html.

Compute / GPU-hours

Three tiers, three clocks. Do not collapse to one GPU-hour number. Tiers 1–2 measure trainer-internal train_time_ms. Tier 3 measures Modal billed A100 container time (train_time_ms ≠ billed).

1 · Local CSVs (pulled)

72.03 h · deduped local train_time_ms · 90 unique runs (101 CSVs − 11 byte-identical). Lower bound of pulled artifacts. Source: GPU_HOURS_LOCAL.md.

2 · Volume train_time

110.18 h · volume log.csv max · 151 run dirs · 150 with clock (99.3%). Broader than local (theory peers, archives, full claim clocks). Source: internal volume inventory.

3 · Modal billed A100

147.91 h all apps · 128.28 h NoCap-named · 13 codes · 2026-07-08→16. Derived from resource $, not a native hour meter. Source: Modal billing export.

Which number to cite? Claim speed uses sealed train_time_ms (F1_seal / candidates) — not these campaign totals. For campaign spend/effort: quote the triple 72.03 / 110.18 / 147.91 and name the clock.

Ratios. Billed all-apps vs volume: 1.34× (147.91 / 110.18). Billed NoCap vs volume: 1.16× (128.28 / 110.18). Billed vs local: 2.05×. Local is a pulled subset of volume — not apples-to-apples with billed.

Why tiers diverge. Local < volume: not all volume runs pulled; volumes hold more theory / archive / claim clocks. Billed > volume: container wall clock (image/setup, CUDA init, failed/killed partials without usable CSV, idle while container held) vs trainer-loop train_time_ms. Archive notebook-kernel A100 (~19.63 h) drives most of all-apps vs NoCap-named.

Billed method. modal billing report --show-resources --json; keep A100-40GB rows; gpu_hours = cost_usd / (0.000583 $/s × 3600) (public list price). Report $ is pre-credit. Assumes base-region preemptible; region/non-preempt multipliers would overstate hours.

Storage (volume bytes)

Across 13 nocap volumes: ~302 GiB under runs/ (almost all .pt checkpoints; text logs ~2 MiB), ~56 GiB sum of data/ (~5.6 GiB unique FineWeb pack replicated on many workspaces), ~420 GiB grand total.

Family / rollup (local CSVs) Runs Hours Share
f1 (denominators + finals records) 5 19.47 27.0%
claim_stack 4 14.66 20.4%
theory_* (all) 26 20.78 28.8%
waves (wave2–4 + colab_wave) 16 6.91 9.6%
systems_v1 20 2.95 4.1%
curation 6 3.68 5.1%
horizon / other screens 13 3.58 5.0%
Local total 90 72.03 100%

Caveats. Tiers 1–2: train_time_ms is trainer-loop wall-clock — excludes idle GPU outside the timer, container spin-up, failed spawns with no CSV; partials at measured max only; volume may double-count partial+resume dirs. Tier 3: not native GPU-hours; notebooks and non-NoCap apps inflate all-apps 147.91 vs NoCap 128.28; local 72.03 h is not comparable 1:1 to the billed window. Near-duplicate local logs with different bytes count separate.

Sources: GPU_HOURS_LOCAL.md · internal volume inventory · Modal billing export.

Failures

Hard non-claim. No matched candidate-vs-stock first-cross ΔT%. Stock 1337/2029: never crossed. Seed 4242: stock arm not run. Public % vs F1_seal only.

Item Verdict Evidence
Joint-QKV stock · s1337 no cross Terminal 3.3848.
Joint-QKV stock · s2029 no cross Terminal 3.3840.
Joint-QKV stock · s4242 not run Cand-only seal.
Candidate vs stock ΔT% N/A No matched first-cross %.
F2 short warmdown quality miss Terminal ≈ 3.405. Never crossed.
F2b long warmdown speed retracted Quality HIT. Historical wall ≈ −2.9% retracted (noise / confound).
claim_muon_par quality miss Final 3.386130. Never crossed.
claim_muon_wsd speed miss Quality ~3.376; T ≈ 3.899 h ≈ 0.8% slower than F1_seal.
Board-v3 800-step no promote Proxies ≠ full claim.
Dual-polar split-QKV time tax ~+0.015 CE; time ratio ≈ 1.026.
Tier A hparams 5/5 NO-GO mom / Adam WD / WD160. Defaults stay.
Adam LR 0.003 alone NO-GO Mid-horizon lead failed @2400.
“Officially won NoCap” pending Organizer acceptance not in local seals.

Full ledger: FAILURE_LEDGER.html.

Recipe

Claim-stack v1. Seeds 1337, 2029, 4242. Stock control = same stack with joint QKV (muon_split_qkv=0).

Model / data
GPT-2 d12 · raw FineWeb · seq 1024 · official disjoint val
Batch
B32 × accum16 · 524,288 tok/update · 4768 steps
Muon
LR 0.02 · mom 0.95 · WD 0.1 · NS 5
Adam (embed/lm_head)
LR 0.0018 · WD 0.1
Schedule
warmup 476 · warmdown 1192 · zloss 0 · frozen unigram prior
Candidate delta
muon_split_qkv=1 · match_joint=0
Environment
A100-SXM4-40GB · torch 2.13.0+cu130 · 1 GPU · bf16 · compile on
Attribution
Keller Jordan Muon + campaign timing-cheap split-QKV (B32 systems path)

Pin card: RECIPE_CARD.html. Narrative source: COMPREHENSIVE_REPORT.md.

Verification + links

Recompute claim ΔT% from public data/*.csv: gate → clock → cross. Implementation and run logs: challenge repository · kit/ · claim-stack v1 · reproduce notes · F1_seal logs. (Repo access may be required until the challenge tree is opened.)

Loading first-passage chart from data/chart_series.json

1 · Gate

Horizontal line: val ≤ 3.3821. Quality first. (= recompute step 1)

2 · Clock

Vertical F1_seal: sealed baseline 3.866 h. (= ΔT% denominator)

3 · Cross

Magenta markers: first-cross before baseline → ΔT% vs F1_seal (not vs stock).

Loading…
Figure — first-passage verify. Disjoint validation loss (y) vs training-time hours (x). Dashed line: target 3.3821. Dotted vertical: F1_seal first-cross at 3.866 h. Magenta marks candidates. Seed 1337 is summary-only (no public CSV). Seed 2029 joint-QKV stock never crosses. Published ΔT% is vs F1_seal only — matched cand-vs-stock = N/A.
1 · Gate · first-cross = first CSV row where val_disjoint ≤ 3.3821
2 · Clock · T_h = train_time_ms ÷ 3.6e6
3 · Cross · ΔT% = 100 × (3.866 − T_h) / 3.866
4 · Stock · if no row ≤ 3.3821 → matched cand-vs-stock ΔT% = N/A
5 · Separate · claim T ≠ campaign GPU-hours; Muon ≠ Muon-alone ΔT%

Worked example — s2029_cand.csv: step 4736, train_time_ms = 12,840,827.6 → T_h = 3.5669 → ΔT% = +7.7%.

What verify checks vs what literature teaches. Recompute above is CSV arithmetic only. Optimizer and layout primers (Muon, B32, split-QKV) do not mint the sealed %. Campaign totals under Compute are inventory clocks, not claim ΔT%.

Literature context, not campaign evidence. Adjacent papers motivate matrix-aware optimization, WSD schedules, and time-to-result evaluation. A broader synthesis finds recurring mixed optimizer routing, but no verified source tests this campaign’s exact parameter-group partition. Published literature does not validate this campaign’s ΔT% or establish split-QKV causality. Batch and gradient-accumulation research includes counterevidence and throughput tradeoffs; none directly tests this stack or split-vs-joint QKV treatment.

Future research

The sealed 3/3 result measures the full claim stack—Muon routing, B32×accum16, WSD, and timing-cheap split-QKV—against sealed F1_seal on a fixed A100/torch pin. The reported ΔT% reflects that combined recipe; it does not isolate which component drove the wall-clock gain. Where measured, joint-QKV stock never crossed; seed 4242 has candidate only. Matched candidate-vs-stock first-cross ΔT% remains N/A.

Verified adjacent work on Practical Efficiency of Muon, WSD schedules, small-batch and gradient accumulation, AlgoPerf time-to-result evaluation, and AdamW motivates tighter controls but does not validate this stack. Priorities:

1 · Matched QKV arms

Split-QKV candidate vs joint-QKV stock on all three seeds to the same step horizon, including a stock arm for seed 4242.

2 · Leave-one-out ablations

A leave-one-component-out sequence: drop one of Muon routing, B32×accum16, WSD pins, or split-QKV per run under identical pins.

3 · Threshold sensitivity

Re-analyze existing CSVs for how first-cross T_h shifts with validation threshold and logging cadence before new GPU runs.

4 · Seeds and intervals

Add seeds and report uncertainty intervals on wall-clock crossing time, alongside point first-cross estimates.

5 · Replication and profiling

Equal-tuning AdamW re-seal plus one replication across model depth, accelerator, or data mix; profile NS steps and gradient-accumulation overhead where they explain wall clock.

Claimed

Candidate first-crosses ≤3.3821 on 3/3 seeds; each ≥6% under sealed F1_seal on the matched GPU/torch pin. Recompute from public CSVs in data/.

Not claimed

Not an official NoCap win. Matched first-cross speedup vs joint-QKV stock = N/A. No % vs historical notebook F1. No board % from 800-step proxies. Why each clause.

Compute tiers are separate. Campaign totals 72.03 / 110.18 / 147.91 h are inventory clocks (train_time_ms ≠ billed) — see Compute.

Muon hedge. Attribution: Keller Jordan Muon + timing-cheap split-QKV (B32 systems path). Sealed ΔT% is the claim-stack, not Muon alone. Public sealed kit: TRAINER_DELTA.html · kit/ (this site) · kit/ on GitHub ↗.